UNSOLVED

Spartan033

updated

21 years ago

S

Spartan033

27 Posts

0

7506

January 11th, 2006 04:00

FEAR 6800 256mb

I have a question. How does fear run on the PCI Express 16x, 12 pixel pipeline, 256mb Gforce 6800. I see no benchmarks for the 256mb 6800 standard. If someone has this card and a similar setup to mine please let me know what settings you are running and how it plays. Because I saw a benchmark with a 6800GS 256mb. And it was on 1280x960, high details, soft shadows off, AA and AF off, running at an average of 44 FPS. I am guessing the standard 256mb 6800 will get 35 or so. Most console games run at 30 frames per second so I am even satisfied with that.But does anyone have the card to confirm it?
 
3.0 gig pentium D processor
1gig of ram
256mb 6800
 
Heres my cpu, ram, and vid card.

Message Edited by Spartan033 on 01-11-2006 12:26 AM

  • skankycatz

    17 Posts

    306

    0

    Posted January 11th, 2006 12:00

    i have the 6800, 2gb ram, 3gz pentium 4. i can
     play fear on high but not the highest. if there is a better looking game out there, i haven't seen it. i can just imagine how good it would look at its highest setting.  
  • Spartan033

    27 Posts

    306

    0

    Posted January 11th, 2006 22:00

    And what resolution do you play it at? I am hoping to get 1280x960, high details, no AA and no AF. And its true, FEAR has one of the best graphics to date
  • Stingray6

    35 Posts

    306

    0

    Posted January 12th, 2006 15:00

    Oh, and to anyone considering an XPS 600 ... go for it!

    However, if you are a FPS gamer (vice RTS or MYST or whatever else is out there), opt for the 7800 at a minimum.

  • Stingray6

    35 Posts

    306

    0

    Posted January 12th, 2006 15:00

    I have a 2005 FPW and a 6800 256mb.  I tried to get FEAR to run at that resolution (you can tweak an .ini file to do so).  It would run, but was not the smoothest thing I've ever seen. :)

    I mean, it worked, but when I backed the game down to 1280, it was a much better gaming experience. 

    I've just ordered a BFG 7800 GT OC, and plan to sell the 6800 on Ebay.  My thinking is this:  if the 6800 choked on FEAR (a 2005 game), what will it do when the 2006-2007 games come out?

    My hope is that the 7800 GT will be able to keep pace for a couple of years.

    Just my $0.02! 

  • skankycatz

    17 Posts

    306

    0

    Posted January 12th, 2006 19:00

    the game will auto detect your system and tell you the recommended setting. very nice. it detected mine at 1024 x 768. it's nice to just load a game and play it without having to play around with the settings.
     
    3 gz pentium 4
    nvidia
  • skankycatz

    17 Posts

    306

    0

    Posted January 12th, 2006 19:00

    the game will auto detect your system and tell you the recommended setting. very nice. it detected mine at 1024 x 768. it's nice to just load a game and play it without having to play around with the settings.
     
    3 gz pentium 4
    nvidia 6800
    2 gb ram 
  • Spartan033

    27 Posts

    306

    0

    Posted January 12th, 2006 22:00

    I was hoping I can play with my monitors native resolution- 1280x1024. But I guess it will slow down. The problem is that games are evolving much faster than video cards. I mean, c'mon the 6800 is 1 year old, and there games that already slow down on it. It is ridiculous. But as long as I can get high details and at least 2x AA on 1024x768 then its fine. With playable framerates of course
  • CSPlayer089

    563 Posts

    306

    0

    Posted January 12th, 2006 23:00

    FEAR is a very demanding game. even with my OC'd 7800GT, i was only able to play it at 2xMSAA, 8xAF, Maximum ingame quality, 1024x768