
UNSOLVED
Which CPU is better for gaming?
Intel® Core™2 Q6600 Quad-Core (8MB L2 cache,2.4GHz,1066FSB)
or
Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor E6850 (4MB L2 Cache,3.0GHz,1333 FSB)
or
Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor E6850 (4MB L2 Cache,3.0GHz,1333 FSB)
I'm going to be playing a high-performance game this summer (
www.ageofconan.com)
I've heard that its better to have two faster CPUs, than four slower CPUs and I'm trying to find out how true that is.
Is that enough information to determine the answer? I could find out more if needed.
Responses (14)
Solutions (0)
- Well first of all a Dual-Core is only One processor that has two cores. And a Quad-Core is only one processor that has four cores. And for gaming it would be best to go with the Dual-Core 3Ghz than the Quad-Core 2.4Ghz. This is because no games use all four cores yet and the clock speed on the Dual-Core is a lot faster and will perform better in a game than the Quad-Core. For applications however the Quad-Core would perform best because it has those extra two cores to handle processing with. So it all depends on what your main priority for the PC is. For gaming go with the Dual-Core for applications go for the Quad-Core. Hope this helped
- I just got info that the game I'll be playing will utilize all four cores in the quad-core CPUso does that change things?againIntel® Core™2 Q6600 Quad-Core (8MB L2 cache,2.4GHz,1066FSB)
or
Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor E6850 (4MB L2 Cache,3.0GHz,1333 FSB) - If you have an XPS 720, try the new Wolfdale E8400, or E8500 dual core. I've been messing with an E8400 since last friday, and this little 3Ghz 45nm processor runs super. I got this thing for 188 bucks, for my money cost vs performance, this is the way to go, for now anyway. On another note, the E6850 is no slouch either.I have had the E8400 clocked up to 3.2GHz so far. :smileywink:
Message Edited by gdwrnch3 on 01-30-2008 05:53 AM

ThePug628
200 Posts
360
0
Posted January 30th, 2008 00:00