UNSOLVED

cswaters1

updated

17 years ago

C

cswaters1

27 Posts

0

1677

December 9th, 2009 15:00

Move Data between CLARiiONs on same fabric / FC switches

We've currently got 3 SAN's,

1 is Prod CX3-20c at Head Office

1 is DR CX3-20c at a remote site

1 is Dev CX500 at Head Office

We use MirrorView/S over FCIP to replicate data between Prod and DR fabrics, consistency groups are used to keep data in sync (and to interop with VMware Site Recovery Manager)

Dev and Prod are connected to the same fabric / FC Switches.

What we're after is the ability to copy Prod to Dev say once a quarter to keep Dev up-to-date.

Now we were orignally just going to have a second secondary image of our production data on CX500, but because we use consistany groups we cannot have more than one secondary image not happy with this!

What options can you think of to be able to refresh our Dev on a regular basis without too much manual effort?

Look forward to your replys.

Craig.

  • dynamox

    11 Legend

    •

    20419 Posts

    •

    87439 Points

    724

    1

    Posted December 9th, 2009 19:00

    Hello Craig,

    got SanCopy on production array ? Could use that to copy data between arrays.

  • chiodp

    149 Posts

    724

    1

    Posted December 10th, 2009 03:00

    One options will be a clone of your secondary image and than sancopy to the CX500 .

    Pierluca Chiodelli

    Corporate System Eng.

    Phone 508-382-6104

    Mobile 508-561-4403

  • cswaters1

    27 Posts

    725

    0

    Posted December 13th, 2009 15:00

    Just to add more detail, the DEV SAN has enough space to hold a second copy of the Data, but the Prod / DR SANs are fully loaded.

    SAN copy sounds interesting, we're not currently licensed for it though, so this would be an additional cost - no that big an issue if it makes admin easier.

    Can anyone offer any other options?  We'd prefer to use existing technologies if possible...

    Thanks for all your input!

  • kelleg

    6 Operator

    •

    4537 Posts

    725

    0

    Posted December 14th, 2009 12:00

    Have you considered not using consistency groups and by using host-based tools to pause the source LUNs when you need to fracture the mirrors to keep the images consistent?

    glen

  • AranH1

    2163 Posts

    725

    0

    Posted December 14th, 2009 12:00

    SANCopy is easy to setup and run. You can create scripts so that once a quarter you just dismount the dev LUNs, run the synch, and then mount the dev LUNs up again. Since both arrays are CLARiIONS and in the same fabric this will be the easiest method to use if the extrac cost of the license is not an issue.
  • AranH1

    2163 Posts

    725

    0

    Posted December 14th, 2009 13:00

    No, you just need to license it on one of the arrays. I would license it on your production array, it will give you more flexibility in the future for you production array.
  • cswaters1

    27 Posts

    725

    0

    Posted December 14th, 2009 13:00

    What kind of performance impact would the SANcopy have on the production Data?  What scripting can be done to control what, when and how data is copied?

    Thanks for your info,

    cswaters1

  • cswaters1

    27 Posts

    725

    0

    Posted December 14th, 2009 13:00

    would I need to license SANcopy on both the Prod and Dev Arrays?

    Thanks,

    cswaters1

  • AranH1

    2163 Posts

    94

    0

    Posted December 14th, 2009 14:00

    Replication manager also adds more complexity and requirements since you have to create an application set that is tied to a specific host configured for a specific file system or application to replicate, and the hosts all need to have all the correct software installed for the version of RM installed. I use RM a lot for replications that require it, but for the occasional SANcopy I just use basic scripts and it is much simpler to setup and manaage natively than using RM.
  • dynamox

    11 Legend

    •

    20419 Posts

    •

    87439 Points

    725

    0

    Posted December 14th, 2009 14:00

    i don't remember seeing numbers but SanCopy will steal IOPS from your production drives, although you have options

    1) control SanCopy speed but using priority ..10 is full blast, 1 is the slowest

    2) perform copy at specific time, say you want to SanCopy your production LUNs the way they looked at 6pm. You mark your production LUNs at 6pm but start the actual transfer at 10pm to cause as little performance impact on production as possible.

    it could be a strategy that combines both options.

    SanCopy can be controlled via naviseccli so any scripts that can issue those commands will work (perl,vbscript, bash). I believe Replication Manager can do the same thing with a lot more bells and whistles but you have to purchase it.