UNSOLVED

ky331

updated

19 years ago

K

ky331

5 Journeyman

•

15640 Posts

•

45086 Points

0

2027

July 31st, 2007 12:00

Ad-Aware 2007 0012.0000 Is Now Available

0012.0000 Is Now Available, New Definition File For Ad-Aware 2007

 

New definitions:
====================
Win32.PWS.FretHog +2

 

Updated definitions:
====================
Adware.Delf +3
Win32.Backdoor.PcClient
Win32.Spybot.worm
Win32.TrojanDownloader.Small
Win32.TrojanPWS.Magania
Virtumonde

 

MD5 checksum is 225f5b1fde8ae1fd2deb8e5024a790e9



Message Edited by ky331 on 07-31-2007 09:18 AM
  • dacohenz

    3 Posts

    165

    0

    Posted July 31st, 2007 21:00

    I have read some bad things about the new adaware on download.com, but on the couple of occasions that I have used the software, I have found that it works just fine.  Has anyone else had any good or bad experiences with the new adaware?
     
    Dave :robottongue:
  • ky331

    5 Journeyman

    •

    15640 Posts

    •

    45086 Points

    165

    0

    Posted July 31st, 2007 23:00

    The consensus here, from regulars like Joe53, 1972vet, and myself, is that Ad-Aware '07 is a complete fiasco, which cannot be recommended in its current form.   See, for example:
     
     
     
     
     
     


    Message Edited by ky331 on 07-31-2007 08:49 PM
  • tommyo1954

    1527 Posts

    165

    0

    Posted August 1st, 2007 00:00

    In my opinion, it was fairly good a few years ago. Spybot too... good at one time but mediocre at best now. A program can only be as effective as the timely updated malware definitions it recieves. Both Spybot and Adaware are has-beens...
    The new kid on the block runs rings around them both...that being (free too) superantispyware.
     
    (no, I am not part owner of it, lol.. just a happy user of it..)
  • ky331

    5 Journeyman

    •

    15640 Posts

    •

    45086 Points

    165

    0

    Posted August 1st, 2007 00:00

    tommy wrote:  " A program can only be as effective as the timely updated malware definitions it receives...
     
    that's only a secondary part of the story:   Both Ad-Aware SE and SpyBot still update their definitions at least weekly  (granted, that's not as good as daily).  
     
    But the real problem [as I see it] is much more significant... the underlying programming techniques invoked by Ad-Aware SE and SpyBot 1.4 are incapable of adequately combating today's newer incarnations of malware... even if they were to receive daily updates!   --- Just look at how many versions of Vundo/Virtumundo or Smitfraud they claim to find, yet fail to remove.
     
    But let's give credit where credit is due... they were more than just "fairly good" years ago... they were, in fact, the primary tools of choice  in their day.   Alas, neither is of much value at present...
     
    and I concur fully with your view that SuperAntiSpyware is currently the best free on-demand anti-malware scanner available.  
    This opinion is based on the number of severely infected systems I've been able to help other people clean by suggesting/using SuperAntiSpyware.  
    [Personally, SAS has never found anything more than tracking cookies for me, but I attribute that to the fact that I do my best to practice "safe surfing", and to keep my systems clean... ]



    Message Edited by ky331 on 07-31-2007 10:07 PM
  • S.C

    2 Intern

    •

    503 Posts

    165

    0

    Posted August 1st, 2007 02:00

    I still run Spybot Seach and Destroy 1.4 and rely on it heavily. It could be another option to add SuperAntiSpyware along with that too. I might look into that. Right now, I'm pretty happy with Spybot Search and Destroy. Just adding my two cents in.
  • S.C

    2 Intern

    •

    503 Posts

    165

    0

    Posted August 1st, 2007 13:00

    Dave,
     
    I installed SuperAntiSpyware just to add to my computer protection arsenal. I have it running a complete scan of my computer right now.
  • ky331

    5 Journeyman

    •

    15640 Posts

    •

    45086 Points

    165

    0

    Posted August 1st, 2007 13:00

    S.C
     
    I still use SpyBot 1.4 [and am in the process of  evaluating  the BETA 1.5]...
     
    SpyBot has been offering updated definitions every Wednesday.  I'll get the updates, run the scan...
     
    In my case, since I run several scanners... and try to practice "safe surfing".... SpyBot rarely picks-up on anything on my computers  [Today's new definitions picked up on a Yahoo! Coupon Bar that my wife intentionally installed a while back, and I'm leaving it alone, because I know she wants it]
     
    But while I may still "use" SpyBot, I cannot say that I "rely on it" at all (and certainly not "heavily" )... rather, I just consider it one of several "secondary" (or "backup" ) scanners that I continue to run... simply out of paranoia :smileywink:


    Message Edited by ky331 on 08-01-2007 10:07 AM
  • ky331

    5 Journeyman

    •

    15640 Posts

    •

    45086 Points

    165

    0

    Posted August 1st, 2007 13:00

    If you're running other scanners [and "surfing safely"], don't be surprised if it says your're "clean"... or if it ony finds tracking cookies....
    it's still the best free generic anti-malware scanner that I know of, should you ever have a real malware problem.
     
    by "generic" (in the above context), i mean it's an overall scanner... as opposed to a "specialized"/dedicated scanner [like VundoFix, which only scans for Vundo/Virtumundo]
     


    Message Edited by ky331 on 08-01-2007 10:50 AM
  • S.C

    2 Intern

    •

    503 Posts

    165

    0

    Posted August 1st, 2007 13:00

    Ah well. Thanks for the information.
     
    Stephanie