UNSOLVED

leroyl

updated

19 years ago

L

leroyl

19 Posts

0

8178

January 8th, 2008 01:00

Storage C 5.0 on a windows 2003 64-Bit Server.

Is it possible to run StorageC v5 on a windows 64-bit server?
 
I did try it in the lab and everything seems to "almost" work. I can add the 64 bit server and then do a scan on it and StorageC is able to scan the server with out error. StorageC doesn't know what version of OS its running (that's a bad sign).
 
But, when i go to assign a LUN to it, the 64-bit server is not visible in the list of servers to choose from.
 
There are 2 possible answers i can think of..
 
1. StorageC just wont work on a 64-bit server... then I am done!
2. The HBA type/driver is not compatible.
 
I am using a QLA2310 since this HBA has a driver that supports the windows 2003  64-bit OS. Does storageC only support the QLA2200 model? Are there other HBA's that it can support that might have a 64-bit driver available?
 
Or maybe ill get lucky and someone has actually done this??
 
Thanks
Leroy L.
 
 
  • vantseto

    11 Posts

    128

    0

    Posted January 8th, 2008 17:00

    The StorageC does not work properly, but this does not prevent you for using the 660f. All you have to do is install the wwnmgr utility on a windows 2000 server, and then online the HDs for all x64 machines you have. Then you are done.

    PS. It took me a month to figure it out and work around this problem.
     
    I am using the qla2342
  • leroyl

    19 Posts

    128

    0

    Posted January 20th, 2008 04:00

     
    This worked exactly like you said..
     
    But i have a question. Where is this LUN mapping stored. On the 660F, the 51F switch or something with the QLA san/surfer HBA?
     
    the reason why i ask is.. what happen when a new server is added to the SAN does it try to connect to the LUN's? Or by doing this does this prevent this from happening?
     
    i also got the WWname manager working on a 2003 server.
     
    Thanks for the info on this.
     
    Leroy L
  • vantseto

    11 Posts

    128

    0

    Posted January 21st, 2008 18:00

    How did you get the wwname to work on the 2003 x64 server? I was not able to do so due to some java issues.
     
    The LUN Mapping is stored inside the 660f controllers, and then you can control access to the wwns from the switch (almost every small business has not configuration on the fiber switch - all can see all). So far the newly created wwns are visible on the fiber. Then you do LUN masking on the qla controller with the san surfer.
     
    Notice that lun mapping and lunmasking are not the same. As far as I can tell, lun mapping is not used anymore and it was something specific to the 660f.