UNSOLVED

Ayrton_Senna1

updated

11 years ago

A

Ayrton_Senna1

1 Rookie

•

62 Posts

0

3139

August 14th, 2015 15:00

How to encapsulate (1storage-vol to 1 virtual-vol) a VMAX symdev in VPLEX using VPLEXCLI?

Hi, I am trying to find a proper procedure to perform VPLEX encapsulation of a symdev that has data on it using VPLEXCLI. Lets assume symdev id is 01AF (200GB) is presented to VPLEX. From vplex cli i ran this command to list the presented symdev.

1. /clusters/cluster-1/storage-elements/storage-volumes>ll    (to list all available storage volumes)

2. VPlexcli:/clusters/cluster-1/storage-elements/storage-volumes> claim --thin-rebuild --appc --name sym_vmax_01AF --storage-volumes VPD83T3:6006016091c50e005057534d0c17e011     (This will claim the storage volume, i've used application consistency flag and thin rebuild since my storage is vmax 40K and renames myu storage volume to sym_vmax_01AF )

3. At this point i want to create a virtual volume on top of this claimed storage volume to create a 1 to 1 relation ship between storag vol, extent,device and virtual volume. I came across this command called storage-tool

4. VPlexcli:/> storage-tool compose --name TEST --geometry raid-0 --storage-volumes sym_vmax_01AF

  (My hope is that this would create 1 to 1 relationship on storage-vol to vvol and keep the existing data intact.)

Has anyone tested this, is my approach correct in encapsulating the exisitng LUN into VPLEX  using CLI, I know unishpere is lot easier, but doing from CLI is what i want to learn. Please suggest any improvements if my procedure is correct.

Environment:

4 engine cluster :VPLEX LOCAL

Geo synchrony: 5.4

VMAX 40K

  • SameerKulkarni1

    2 Intern

    •

    37 Posts

    1474

    1

    Posted September 23rd, 2015 06:00

    Hi,

    with 5.4 i dont think --appc parameter is used if i remember correctly.

    and yes, the storage-tool command syntax you mentioned is correct.

    Cheers,

    Sameer Kulkarni

  • hernster

    1 Rookie

    •

    63 Posts

    1474

    0

    Posted September 23rd, 2015 13:00

    After you claim

    # create extent

    extent create -d

    # create device

    local -device create -n -g raid-0 -e

    # create virtual volume

    virtual-volume create -r

  • SameerKulkarni1

    2 Intern

    •

    37 Posts

    1474

    0

    Posted September 24th, 2015 23:00

    Hernan,

    as we are sure about 1:1 relation between SV and VV then we can use storage-tool which would in turn create extends and devices by itself.

    BR,

    Sameer

  • hernster

    1 Rookie

    •

    63 Posts

    1474

    0

    Posted October 5th, 2015 13:00

    Why not use the example as documented in the CLI reference guide p422 ?

    storage-tool compose TEST raid-1 VPD83T3:60000000aaa000000000000000000001

    You've piqued my interest - I will try this in our lab environment.

  • SameerKulkarni1

    2 Intern

    •

    37 Posts

    1474

    0

    Posted October 8th, 2015 02:00

    I was exactly referring to the example mentioned in the cli guide. should work perfectly

    Cheers,

    Sameer