As you can see, we used the "FA" flag instead of the "SA" flag.
The command didn't return any errors, and actually it did what we needed. But we got one device (on a list of 79 devices), that got WD in all its directors.
Obviously the first assumption was that the wrong flag did it, but if that's the case, why none of the other devices was affected like this one?
My experience with symdev command taught me the it doesn't like the fa switch, but rather insists that I use the sa flag. What symcli version are you running?
Actually last week I opened a case about v7 when using server-client topology with 7 being the client on a win host, all symdev commands and symmask refresh don't work...
xe2sdc
6 Operator
•
2831 Posts
530
0
Posted August 4th, 2009 01:00
Can you please show output of the following command for one of affected devices ??
symdev -sid XXX show YYY