kjstech

updated

11 years ago

K

kjstech

2 Intern

•

363 Posts

•

2 Points

0

2778

July 13th, 2015 06:00

How can I disable NetBios traffic on Celerra CIFS server?

We do not use NetBios on our network so in my crusade to eliminate it along with LLMNR protocol, I have a running Wireshark filter that indicates the only things left are two FreeNAS boxes and our Celerra's CIFS IP.

How can I disable NBNS (NetBios Name Service) on the CIFS server off an EMC Celerra?

  • kjstech

    2 Intern

    •

    363 Posts

    •

    2 Points

    1929

    0

    Posted July 15th, 2015 07:00

    I ended up blocking it on the switch

    Cisco 3750 series switches are used at our facilities.

    Extended IP access list NETBIOS

        deny tcp any any eq 135

        deny udp any any eq 135

        deny tcp any any range 137 139

        deny udp any any range netbios-ns netbios-ss

        deny tcp any any eq 445

        deny udp any any eq 445

        deny udp any any eq 5355

        permit ip any any

    Then attach that access list to the ports that the CIFS interfaces are connected to with

    ip access-group NETBIOS in

    where in this example the access list name is NETBIOS.  (In theory you could name it anything you want or incorporate it with other access lists.)

    Otherwise on our network via GPO we disable Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR), disable netbios via DHCP option 001, and on static servers or non-domain joined systems we manually disable netbios on the interfaces and LLMNR with local security policy.  This greatly reduces man in the middle attacks using SMB relay, even though we turned on force SMB encryption to mitigate that attack our Pen tester demonstrated to us, we went further and disabled those protocols entirely.  In a modern business network I highly recommend it.

  • Jyothi_P_Bharat

    1 Rookie

    •

    317 Posts

    1929

    0

    Posted July 15th, 2015 05:00

    Hi Saurek,

    Please have a look on this kb mentioned below,it might help you but not sure about it:

    81051

    Thanks

    Jyothi

  • Rainer_EMC

    6 Operator

    •

    8645 Posts

    1929

    0

    Posted July 15th, 2015 06:00

    Sorry, but not even close

  • umichklewis

    4 Apprentice

    •

    1190 Posts

    1929

    0

    Posted July 15th, 2015 11:00

    SMB encryption would be nice, but there's a serious lack of SMB encryption support with SMB devices, such as scanners, MFP devices, etc. etc.  It's unfortunate, since it would mitigate a lot of attack vectors.

    Thanks for posting the resolution you applied!