Next I would create an iSCSI storage server on SPa and one on SPb and configure 2 IPs for each (each physical port on different subnet) something like the example on page 14 of the above HA document.
What I'm confused by is the vmware config part, specifically this statement from the HA doc "Once port bindings are added to the software iSCSI adapter, you can configure a single vSwitch with two NICs so that each NIC is bound to one VMkernel port"
My confusion is should that say 4 NICs as there are 4 NICs in the example, is that just a typo? And if so 4 VMkernel ports each setup with 1 active vmnic and 3 unused?
Second question is network config related. Our switches will be Cisco 3750s connected together. Would we need to setup 2 LACP trunks, 1 per SP or 1 per FSN connection (SPa P1 & SPb P1 & SPa P2 & SPb P2)?
Well, it seems EMC gives Contradictory information when it comes to HA and MPIO/Jumbo Frame configuration. In pure VMWare Native language, MPIO Means Multipathing, Jumbo Frame, Means MPIO along with Multipathing and Port Binding.
Now, as per VMWare Support Port Bindings is not supported configuration when it comes to different broadcast domain. And VMware supports Port Binding only on single broadcast domain.
EMC with their HA documentation along with the domain made by Matthew Brender & Henri Hamalainen in the Ask the Expert of "VNXe Front-End Networks with VMWare" gives contradictory information both of the document speaks about HA with different subnets and Ask the Expert document clearly elaborating on the port binding, Round Robin and changing the default IOPS to gain high storage performance.
Now which is supported configuration, I don't and I left it to EMC to answer me on that.
You have 2 dual port cards, one on each SP. That means you can have at the most 2 subnets connected to those. You cannot connect each of these four ports to different subnets.
From page 11 (Fail-safe networking), "To take advantage of FSN, you must cable both SPs the same way." That means, in this case, if you are connecting SPAP1 to switch A, then SPBP1 also should be connected to switch A.
Again, as far as networking goes, it collectively calls SPAP1 and SPBP1 as one say eth10. So from your vmware side, it doesnt see it as 4 nics, it sees as 2 nics.
For your second question also, my response above applies. So, with these 2 port cards, you will be able to just setup one LACP trunk, which would be eth10 and eth11. It internally does the needed trunks of SPAP1+SPAP2 and SPBP1+SPAP2. See Page 18.
Ok yes vmware part makes sense, I confused my self with that.
As for the network config basically you're saying trunk both ports on controller A in the VNX (each being assigned an IP on a different subnet) and that would give that eth10 and do the same on controller B. Then LACP trunk them all on the network side. Makes sense. It's just not at all clear in the documentation. I even ran it by our EMC guy and he said not to trunk the ports on the VNX and do 2 separate LACP trunks on the network side.
HabibalbyBm
29 Posts
1507
0
Posted March 24th, 2013 01:00
Hi GreedDx,
Well, it seems EMC gives Contradictory information when it comes to HA and MPIO/Jumbo Frame configuration. In pure VMWare Native language, MPIO Means Multipathing, Jumbo Frame, Means MPIO along with Multipathing and Port Binding.
I have setup my VNXe3150 with two Subnet VMware Communities: Hussain Al Sayed's Blog: Setting up & Configuring EMC VNXe3150 iSCSI SAN Storage with High Availabil…
SPA-Eth2 10.90.8.1
SPB-Eth2 10.90.8.2
SPA-Eth3 10.100.8.1
SPB-Eth3 10.100.8.2
Now, as per VMWare Support Port Bindings is not supported configuration when it comes to different broadcast domain. And VMware supports Port Binding only on single broadcast domain.
EMC with their HA documentation along with the domain made by Matthew Brender & Henri Hamalainen in the Ask the Expert of "VNXe Front-End Networks with VMWare" gives contradictory information both of the document speaks about HA with different subnets and Ask the Expert document clearly elaborating on the port binding, Round Robin and changing the default IOPS to gain high storage performance.
Now which is supported configuration, I don't and I left it to EMC to answer me on that.
Thanks,