
Solved!
Go to SolutionO
OSDCrusher
92 Posts
0
9794
April 16th, 2009 20:00
Crysis VERY low FPS
Today I installed crysis on my new system. To my surprise, I am getting worse FPS than my old system with a Pentium 4! Is it because I am running vista? Here are my specs:
AMD ATHLON 64 X2 4200+ 2.2 GHz
4 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer DDR2 PC2-6400 RAM
256 MB XFX GeForce 8800GT Alpha Dog Edition
Creative Labs SoundBlaster Audigy 2 ZS 7.1
150 GB Hard Drive
I am running vista service pack 1 and am running crysis on high settings. even if i put crysis on medium, i still get the same FPS as when its on high. i can't figure out waht is wrong.
Responses (9)
Solutions (0)
TheRealFireblad
4 Apprentice
•
4639 Posts
2716
0
Posted April 16th, 2009 22:00
Is it only Crysis you have a problem with? Have you fully patched the game?
But even patched up, Crysis is a well known/infamous system killer - even under XP, and despite having a pretty decent system (what model system is it btw?) :emotion-6:
It's undoubtedly your 256MB graphics card which is the bottleneck though :emotion-55:
Although it may be perfectly suitable for other FPS, Crysis eats 256MB cards for breakfast, dinner, and tea... and still wants more!
OSDCrusher
92 Posts
2716
0
Posted April 17th, 2009 12:00
Crysis is the only game I have installed. The game is not currently patched. It is a Dimension E521. I will try patching the game and I will report back. Also, todau I installed XP Pro SP3 and I gained a 5-10 FPS increase.
OSDCrusher
92 Posts
2716
0
Posted April 17th, 2009 14:00
I can run it on high, but I get 10-30 FPS. I have the 1.2 patch installed and I do see a difference in FPS. am running it on medim 1280x720 with 20-50 FPS. I'm still wondering if this is normal FPS for my system.
I can run it on high, but I get 10-30 FPS. I have the 1.2 patch installed and I do see a difference in FPS. am running it on medim 1280x720 with 20-50 FPS. I'm still wondering if this is normal FPS for my system.
That is pretty normal for the older 256MB card. The newer 512MB 8800GT/9800GT would do better. With a 9600GT, I can run the game at 1440x900 on medium settings. With Crysis Warhead, I have to turn it down to 1280x720 and medium settings. Both running on Vista in DX10 mode. You can pick up some FPS by running the game in DX9 mode, however.
cheezyfresh
1 Message
2716
0
Posted April 17th, 2009 23:00
It may be vista as vista takes 1.5 gb of ram just to run (which is crazy) and crysis is known to have very intensive graphics. I would think that it would be your graphics card. That graphics card would be good for standard games like WoW or The Witcher but Crysis runs at 60 something fps on a supercomputer and we're talking i7 processors overclocked running at 4.5 Ghz and duel ati 4875 (or whatever the newest video card from ati is) so really that isnt bad fps. You can pour money into better stuff or turn your settings down or keep them as they are. Hope this helped a little.
OSDCrusher
92 Posts
2716
0
Posted April 18th, 2009 10:00
I don't have vista anymore. I un-installed it yesterday and Crysis is running better at 1440x900 medium. Warhead is at the same, both running good. I'm going to build a computer by summer or the end of this year. Until then, I will be using the E521.

OSDCrusher
92 Posts
2716
1
Posted April 18th, 2009 13:00
Problem is solved. I downloaded the AMD Dual Core Optimizer. Now at 1280x720 everything on high crysis NEVER goes below 20 FPS, always smooth and very playable. Warhead can be played on gamer 1280x720 and is always playable but sometimes goes as low as 10 FPS. DiRT is running on high 4X AA 1280x720 runs great.