
UNSOLVED
DC
DELL-Chris M
Community Manager
•
56891 Posts
•
232143 Points
0
53171
February 3rd, 2011 07:00
Area-51 thermal/graphical issues with SLI/CFX
* Download and install the latest BIOS version
* Once done, shut down the PC
* Move the secondary graphic card from slot PCI_E3 to slot PCI_E5. If the current bridge is too short, send me the following in a private message -
Email Address:
Name:
Shipping Address:
Phone Number:
PC Service Tag number:
Reason: Moved secondary video card down from PCI_E3 to PCI_E5 to fix thermal/graphical issues. Customer now needs the longer video card bridge
HW617 Longer Nvidia SLI Bridge
XX781 Longer AMD CFX (CrossFireX) Bridge
Note - I can only send parts out to Americas customers. If you are not in the Americas, contact Support for your country and reference this post to get them to send you the bridge.
DELL-Chris M (old account)
#IWork4Dell
Responses (35)
Solutions (0)
A Victor D
34 Posts
930
0
Posted February 4th, 2011 02:00
Appreciate the help Chris, but as Morblore says is it a trade off between Temperature and Performance..?
DELL-Chris M
Community Manager
•
56891 Posts
•
232143 Points
930
0
Posted February 4th, 2011 04:00
Morblore is correct, you will see a difference when running a synthetic benchmarking software. But, I do not believe anyone will "see" the difference while playing a PC game.
DELL-Chris M (old account)
#IWork4Dell
Hi Chris,
I understand that this 'adjustment' is for the the Area 51s but Im going to assume that the PCI spacing between E1 and E3 would be the same if not a bit smaller in the Auroras. So does that mean that the Auroras suffer from the same CFX 'thermal issue' but with no solution due to the lack of the third PCI Express slot?
Hi Chris,
I understand that this 'adjustment' is for the the Area 51s but Im going to assume that the PCI spacing between E1 and E3 would be the same if not a bit smaller in the Auroras. So does that mean that the Auroras suffer from the same CFX 'thermal issue' but with no solution due to the lack of the third PCI Express slot?
All spacing on all SLI/Crossfire motherboards no matter the brand or type is always exactly the same. It has to be for the SLI/Crossfire bridge, case slotting and component manufacturing.
The spacing on the Aurora is no smaller or no bigger then any other system on the planet. That is part of the form factor.
So then would there be a heat issue in Auroras as well then?
Any heat issue would be a result of a defective card or inadequate case ventilation.
I run two 480's which are about as hot as you can get and in the top PCI slots. They do hit as much as 93c sometimes but that is also inside the cards safe operating temperature.
All spacing on all SLI/Crossfire motherboards no matter the brand or type is always exactly the same. It has to be for the SLI/Crossfire bridge, case slotting and component manufacturing. This is only somewhat accurate. I have seen ATX boards with a decent amount of space between two dual slots cards without skipping a slot. The do make sizes in crossfire bridges also. The Aurora is micro ATX and those boards no matter what company always have little spacing with two dual slot cards. The wind tunnel helps the issue though. You should not really have heat issues, it will run hotter than a full tower but well within the limits.
Perhaps an Aurora and Area-51 owner could measure the difference and post the numbers? It is difficult to tell from the pictures.
There is no reason to do so. Both systems are using a ATX motherboard. The ATX form factor has standards. To use a custom PCI layout would mean the rear would not match and in doing so it would not meet the requirements for the ATX form factor.

Pat1
176 Posts
930
0
Posted February 3rd, 2011 14:00
PM sent, thanks for your help.