UNSOLVED

AAdedipe

updated

17 years ago

A

AAdedipe

44 Posts

0

4560

May 12th, 2010 14:00

Is there a plan to create a more Recent Celerra Error Messages Guide?

Hello Guys,

I was trying to solve my own issues and I went to the Celerra documentation repository on Powerlink only to find that the most recent "Celerra Network Server Error Messages Guide" was for DART 5.5.22. Are there any plans to release a version of the software that applies to DART 5.6.x?

Thanks,

Ayo

  • BillStein-Dell

    Moderator

    •

    285 Posts

    1472

    1

    Posted May 14th, 2010 10:00

    The current plan is to migrate as many error messages as possible to the CCMD format (Celerra Common Message Definition).  If you see an error that looks like this:

    BOXMONITOR:CRITICAL:506:::: 78928609786: Enclosure 0  CPU 0  I/O Module 1fault.

    then you can look the message up yourself on the Control Station.  Just take the 11-digit CCMD ID and plug it in to the nas_message command:

    $ nas_message -info 78928609786

    And it will produce the following output:

    MessageID = 78928609835
    BaseID    = 555
    Severity  = CRITICAL
    Component = CS_PLATFORM
    Facility  = BoxMonitor
    Type      = EVENT

    Brief_Description  = Enclosure ${encid,2,%ld} management switch ${num,1,%c} RS-232,  no peer traffic.

    Full_Description   = A management switch internal error occurred. The error is logged when the management switch is not able to control or query the status of enclosure components because of a hardware problem that may be caused by a component or connection outside the management switch. Replacing the enclosure hardware or one of the management switches may be necessary.

    Recommended_Action = Note: Some systems (for example, NS350, NS500, NS600, and NS700) do not support commands that check the environment, enclosures, and setup of the system.

    To resolve the problem, perform the following:
    1. If you are using Unisphere:
             a. Log in as root (requires the root password).
             b. To help diagnose the problem, go to 'Events', show the events for the Control Station, and look for error messages that occurred near the date and timestamp of this message.
             c. Go to 'CLI Commands' and run the "/nasmcd/sbin/setup_enclosure -checkSystem" command to verify that the internal network cables are connected properly. This could take a few minutes.
             d. If the system check reports errors, then fix the errors; if there are no errors, go to step f.
             e. Go to 'CLI Commands' and run again the "/nasmcd/sbin/setup_enclosure -checkSystem" command to verify that the errors were fixed properly. This could take a few minutes.
             f. If you are unable to resolve issues, go to step 3.

    2. If you are using CLI:
             a. Log in as nasadmin (or as a user with NAS administrative privileges) and "su" to root (requires the root password).
             b. To help diagnose the problem, run the "nas_logviewer -v /nas/log/sys_log | less" command and look for error messages that occurred near the date and timestamp of this message.
    Note: Based on when the event occurred, the log messages for this particular event may be located in other generations of the sys_log file (for example, sys_log.1, sys_log.2, through sys_log.10).
             c. Run the "/nasmcd/sbin/setup_enclosure -checkSystem" command to verify that the internal network cables are connected properly. This could take a few minutes.
             d. If the system check reports errors, then fix the errors; if there are no errors, go to step 3.
             e. Run again the "/nasmcd/sbin/setup_enclosure -checkSystem" command to verify that the errors were fixed properly. This could take a few minutes.

    3. If the problem is not resolved, search the Knowledgebase on Powerlink as follows:
             a. Log in to http://powerlink.emc.com and go to Support > Knowledgebase Search > Support Solutions Search.
             b. Use the message ID or text from the error message's brief description to search.

    As you can see, the message descriptions are very thorough.  There are also corresponding entries for most CCMD messages in the Knowledgebase.

    -bill

  • AAdedipe

    44 Posts

    1472

    0

    Posted May 14th, 2010 12:00

    Thanks for the information. The reason I was asking is because I've recieved the following error in my server logs

       VC: 3: 32: Server '161.36.146.29' returned error 'ACCESS_DENIED' when checking file

    and I'd like to troubleshoot it on my own. Since I can't I'll open up an SR.

    Thanks,

    Ayo

  • bergec

    275 Posts

    1476

    0

    Posted May 14th, 2010 14:00

    Interesting

    Are you using a w2k8 server for av checking?

    Have you any policies set in place and what is the AV engine (savse, macafee etc ...)

    Claude

  • bergec

    275 Posts

    1476

    0

    Posted May 16th, 2010 01:00

    Does it return this message on the same files or different files every time you copy the same set of files?

    There is a Primus solution (238805) which describes the same situation when using Nested Mount File System (NMFS) with long pathname, is this the case?

    You should open a Service Request if this does not apply to your situation

    Claude

  • AAdedipe

    44 Posts

    1476

    0

    Posted May 16th, 2010 05:00

    bergec wrote:

    "Are you using a w2k8 server for av checking?"

    I actually am using Win2k8 for these virus checking servers! I'm also using McAfee 8.5 enterprise as the virus scanning solution. We have a CAVA environment for another set of Celerras in our east coast DC and those hosts are using Win2k3 and we don't have any problems. That environment was also set up a 2 years ago and were built using Win2k3, our intel technology team has standardized on Win2k8 for new server builds so that is why I'm using Win2k8 in this instance.

    We implemented the correct policies the first time CAVA was implemented the end result was that an a CAVA ePo was created in McAfee to set the correct policy options so that the CAVA environment could do its work. So the policy issue isn't the problem as it is working on the east coast and not in the new environment on the west coast, the difference between these two sites is that the new environment is using Win2k8.

    Is there a primus article on why using Win2k8 could cause this type of issue? I didn't stumble across this Primus article can you send me the article name?

    I almost forgot to reply to that tidbit and I hope it point me in the right direction.

    Thanks,

    Ayo

  • AAdedipe

    44 Posts

    1476

    0

    Posted May 16th, 2010 05:00

    Claude,

    I came across the emc238805 article as well. But after trying to move the eicar file to a folder that was less than 8 characters I realized this isn't the same issue.  I opend up a case a few days ago and I was told to go and read the CAVA documentation and ensure that I've made the account that starts the CAVA service a local administrator. I've read the documentation cover to cover and I didn't miss that detail so my issue is something else.

    If it turns out that I did miss a detail, I wish the error messages weren't so generic so that a user can self diagnose his/her own issue. The wierd thing is that I have two CAVA servers and I only get the error on one CAVA host and not both, so I know this issue is something deeper. I'll wait till my case owner does some more research before I escalate.

    Thanks for the suggestions.

    Ayo

  • bergec

    275 Posts

    1476

    0

    Posted May 16th, 2010 22:00

    As far as I know, it should work with w2k8. Let us know the SR number.

    Claude

  • bergec

    275 Posts

    1476

    0

    Posted May 17th, 2010 07:00

    Is this w2k8 32bits or 64bits?

    Let us know thé SR number,

    Claude

  • Rainer_EMC

    6 Operator

    •

    8645 Posts

    1476

    0

    Posted May 17th, 2010 07:00

    AFAIK Windows 2008 is always 64 bit ...

  • AAdedipe

    44 Posts

    1132

    0

    Posted May 17th, 2010 07:00

    Bergec,

    I'm running Windows 2008 32bit. I opened SR# 34762896, but I pointed my support engineer to this thread because I saw your post and thought you might have had insight into why Win2k8 would have been a bad CAVA host OS. But since you say it isn't then I'm still stumped as to why I'm having an issue.

    Thanks,

    Ayo